![]() Be sure to keep an eye out for Digital Foundry's analysis on all of this soon. Given the reviews currently on Steam, it is fair to say that perhaps it did. The language used by EA here, along with some of the reports from early reviewers, left many wondering whether the game needed longer before launch, rather than being released with issues that need to be subsequently ironed out. ![]() Then, in the coming weeks, it would release several more. Yesterday, EA said it would be releasing a day one patch for Star Wars Jedi: Survivor. Others, meanwhile, have seen their game crash, or not load properly at all. Someone has even gone as far to call Star Wars Jedi: Survivor "one of the worst ports in recent memory", and let's be honest, there have been some doozies out there. It's a rad game but definitely wait unless you have 24 GB of VRAM and don't mind playing games at 30 fps." Lowering the settings and using FSR don't make a tiny bit of difference. Other areas give me a mostly consistent 45. "I'm using a 3090 FE and 5700x and getting a consistent 30 fps in some areas. "Game is extremely fun but performs terribly," another added. ![]() Here's Star Wars Jedi: Survivor's final trailer. "Runs like my ass after Taco Bell," wrote one player, and they are far from alone with this sentiment (although, so far at least, alone with that particular wording). At the time of writing, only 34 percent of Steam reviews for Star Wars Jedi: Survivor are positive. Over on Steam, the game currently sits with a "mostly negative" reception, with many lamenting its poor performance. Star Wars Jedi: Survivor released today, but so far things are not looking too good for Cal Kestis' latest outing on PC.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |